Reviewers are requested to evaluate manuscripts objectively, fairly, and confidentially. The assessment should focus on the scientific quality, originality, clarity, methodology, and contribution of the manuscript to the field of Islamic Education.

• Does the manuscript present a coherent and logical argument?
• Are the ideas clearly organized and effectively communicated?
• Is the overall structure easy to follow?

• Does the title accurately represent the manuscript content?
• Is the writing concise, clear, and grammatically correct?
• Is the manuscript easy to read and understand?

• Should any section be expanded or further developed?
• Are there sections that should be condensed or summarized?
• Can any content be combined or removed for clarity?

• Is the title concise and informative?
• Does it reflect the main findings or contribution?
• Are unnecessary words and abbreviations avoided?

Assess whether the abstract clearly includes:

• Research objective(s)
• Research method
• Main findings
• Conclusion

• Clearly explains the research background.
• Provides state-of-the-art references.
• Identifies research gaps and novelty.
• States objectives or research questions.
• Explains the proposed approach to address the problem.

• Methods are described clearly and reproducibly.
• Research procedures are sufficiently detailed.
• Participants, instruments, and data analysis are adequately explained.
• The methodology is appropriate for the study objectives.

• Results are clearly presented in tables or figures.
• Findings address the research objectives.
• Results are compared with relevant previous studies.
• Scientific interpretation is provided for each finding.
• Research implications are discussed.
• Limitations of the study are acknowledged.
• Future research opportunities are identified.

• Answers the research objectives.
• Provides implications or recommendations where appropriate.
• Written in paragraph form rather than bullet points.
• Clearly reflects the study findings.